Published in History of the trace, if the inventory accumulation of three decades of research results, it also should consciously undertake a review and summary of the task, then, trace the original intention, is to ask the three years following Institute for the History of Chinese Philosophy background concepts and methods to explore the history of Chinese philosophy has been to promote the new era of power and discipline problems started awareness, more importantly, to The Interaction between the logic. Such a That, however, is far more based on a position above the Comments in the past, more constructive. History of Chinese Philosophy
three years time being can be divided into four consecutive stages: 80 to 85 years for the sector, divided into two stages; 90 so far in 2002 largely as a boundary, two phases. Stages based on the one hand, the theme is based on mastery of different times, and the History of Chinese Philosophy in the field of refraction, the other is based on the history of Chinese philosophy in at different times on different contemporary issues of participation and contribution , to be divided. While in the History of Chinese Philosophy in the four stages of concern with different ideas and knowledge orientation,Discount UGG boots, but the commencement of four stages, still common subjects with the Chinese philosophy, This problem, on the one hand the performance of culture, the relationship between traditional, on the other hand the performance of modern Western philosophy and Chinese culture, traditional sources and the relationship between national character. Therefore, we can also say that the
Strictly speaking, between ancient and modern Chinese and Western General philosophy on the theoretical level, Since modern times have plagued one of China's So, how to straighten out the of political, social, cultural issues, to provide a theory for what kind of problems.
formed three decades among the four stages of each stage are, respectively, with a general knowledge of the common tendency of concerns and ideas, despite the concerns and knowledge around the tendency of these ideas, there is a clear point of view and orientation differences and differences; the same time, every stage of the formation, in fact they are all come from a stage before the A breakthrough in every aspect, all focused on a series of theoretical debates of the hot spots. This article describes the following, we will first focus on these bring about have formed on the different stages of the History of Chinese Philosophy
is Zhdanov, or Lenin? - Taiyuan at the Although many of the views and opinions at the meeting, in fact, is already before the meeting after another to be seen. But in general, as the Chinese Academy of Social Philosophy Research Institute, Department of Philosophy, Peking University, Renmin University Philosophy Department,cheap UGG boots, Shanxi Institute of Philosophy and Social Sciences co-sponsored, In concluding the meeting, especially the past 57 years the lessons of History of Chinese Philosophy to guide the future direction of the History of Chinese Philosophy, and an important indicator of significance.
methodological problems the so-called history of philosophy, in fact, how to apply the Marxist view of history of philosophy and method of the problem. [1] It is clear that the meeting was echoed twenty-two years ago, in January 1957, at the Peking University Department of Philosophy at the problem. And 57 years of that meeting, and soon in 58 years will be characterized as [2] the focus of debate both sides, in fact, is the philosophy of how to treat Zhdanov Shi Dingyi problem, and the deeper meaning, it is how to look at philosophical and political point of view or philosophical struggle and the logic of political struggle problems. In a sense, the tone of the meeting in 1979, basically back to the 57 years the attitude and position meetings, adhere to the definition advocated Zhdanov to Zhdanov defined by the amendment, which aims to restore and re-established under the guidance of Marxist philosophy relations, reversing the two to be confused with the simple practice of arbitrarily through the history of philosophy of science, the political views correctly based on
Zhdanov definition on the history of philosophy, namely that factional fighting in the growth of idealism and developed, then the history of philosophy is the history of struggle against materialism and idealism, History of Philosophy of people mistakenly believe that only the history of materialism over idealism, which view of nature and emphasis on epistemology, ignoring the social history; second is how to overcome the neglect of the dialectic struggle of metaphysics; third is not given the history of philosophy idealism philosophical schools with due historical position, did not see the history of the idealist school of historical inevitability and epistemological roots of idealism schools do not recognize the need for a comprehensive understanding of the history of philosophy, etc. [4]. Meeting in 1979, participants are more conscious and focused use of Lenin's philosophy Shi Dingyi to criticize the definition of Zhdanov, and thus clarify the misunderstanding in the past for Lenin's definition of misuse. Lenin's Thus, as Mr. Wang Zaisong pointed out, despite the historical development of human knowledge, materialism and idealism is mainly the history of the struggle, but we still [5] because the actual development of human knowledge can not use a simple classification of materialism and idealism can grasp. And later, Feng Qi along the same lines, made of Lenin's definition of invention in more depth, combined with his creative philosophy of Mao Zedong on the definition of a clear philosophical Shiding Yi as a There will start to understand the relationship between the dialectical movement. . Also, if the history of philosophy understood as The awareness campaign as part of the dialectic. Thus, the philosophy Shiding Yi Feng Qi significance of the intellectual history, history of philosophy of making a certain extent, can get rid of dogmatism, as far as possible as it would have to return to the actual history of the development history of philosophy.
In addition,UGGs, in this meeting, the significance of research on the history of philosophy, many participants have taken note of Engels in the ability is a gift. This capacity must be developed and training, and to carry out this exercise, in addition to studying the past, the philosophy and know no other means now. theory of thinking. [7] Accordingly, an idealist philosopher of ideology, not only to determine the date it is idealism, but rather the . Thus, the purpose of the history of philosophy, can not just struggle to find the absolute idealism and materialism, so as to establish a philosophical and political views, philosophical struggle and political struggle between the [8] for the purpose. Later, Feng Qi is further to Lenin and Engels on Philosophy Shi Dingyi Xilian be possible to establish a summary of the history of Chinese philosophy, the regularity of theoretical thinking,
Feng Qi published in 1983, Awareness of their thoughts and problems of concern is the methodology of the history of Chinese philosophy discussion as background, knowledge, logic and the logic of the times as a model for interaction.
regularity as a summary of theoretical thinking, the use of dialectical method to create a History of Chinese Philosophy has shared the premise of the concept, but for future generations Xi Yan be aware, there is in his use of Marxism to emphasize and highlight once again, we may have the nationality of his emphasis and sort them in depth; some are unique to his innovative special knowledge, but was later thought History Institute for the History of Chinese Philosophy forgotten, and we need to be in the new context to reconstruct the context. All of these features for the past three decades our understanding of the History of Chinese Philosophy has considerable intrinsic importance of context.
First, we need to look at is that he held the history of the ideological characteristics of philosophical problems. Feng Qi accepted definition of Engels on the philosophy that philosophy is the way to master the world of theoretical thinking, History of philosophy as rooted in social practice exists around the relationship to start thinking and understanding of the dialectical movement, in fact, to grasp the world of theoretical thinking that the logic of their own development process, the logic of development is posed in a series of theoretical thinking and understanding of links dialectical movement between the expansion. Therefore, the history of philosophy must be the historical method and logical method of unification, and ultimately to the logical method of organization proposed the development of knowledge of the historical process, although the historical method in determining the logical thinking of starting point and basis when necessary, but to really basic grasp of the historical connection, we must clear out the history of the external forms and accidental things, to inspect, and then together, to grasp the logic of the contact and the development of the law. way, and secondly, the history of philosophy is the way this understanding the logic of dialectical materialism toward the development of sports. This shows that the history of philosophy of the program, is actually a history of constantly peeling off the external form and the working process of chance. This process is a natural set of theoretical reflection after the event.
History of Philosophy as a meta theory of reflection, Mr. Ren Jiyu about the history of philosophy may be more clearly defined. Mr Yam pointed out, similar, but substantially different, [11] Philosophy is different from academic history, the History of the Department, specific knowledge is that it is the view behind the summary and generalization. Then, on the history of philosophy is essentially a Reflecting its set of post is obvious. Lan in his
is also worth noting that, despite any Feng (Qi), where the two philosophical predecessors, actually accepted the concept of philosophy is to accept the truth of Marxism, but they come to discuss the meaning of universality philosophical view on this point, but it is a reflection of the times characteristics. Such as lan-phase and put a total of special phase relations, the relationship between the general and special problems, as a philosophy of common problems to look at, the same can be said to reflect a philosophical concept of the default. At the same time, perhaps as a reflection of the times characteristic, they are trying to philosophy as a rational belief to accept, the difference is whether the kind of philosophy as the truth of rational belief to accept it. Dainian in the philosophy of youth through their exploration, in determining the superiority of the new theory of materialism, the one to be accepted as a philosophical truth, which as a comprehensive analysis of the philosophical elements and ideals of the foundation and guidance, and the other On the one hand while at the same time as a personal faith to guide the rational life, would best reflect the nature of this philosophy. [12]
conducted based on this philosophy and narrative history of Chinese philosophy, in fact, most will highlight this philosophy under the guidance of the characteristics of cultural values. Feng Qi Yang said the original choice as the beginning of ancient Chinese philosophy is focused on the beginning of the formation of theoretical thinking, understanding of history from the perspective of dialectical movement to be determined. And Feng Qi similar to that, Mr. Zhu Bokun is through the interpretation of the hexagram and line statements. ... ... the discussion of Chinese philosophy to learn from the past, talk about the history of Chinese philosophy, conclusions, philosophical significance of these findings, the source from philosophy to learn. Therefore, learn the history of philosophy is a history of Chinese philosophy, and history of Chinese philosophy is actually the interpretation of the Book of Changes by means of the formation of the metaphysical, cosmological concepts, propositions, thinking history. Just as Chen Lai said, [13] Feng Qi and its access path and near the end for it. Obviously, the focus of their unique value is not the origin of Chinese civilization, formation and development. Qi
in view, the era of ideological and national traditions as the essence of philosophy is the history of Chinese philosophy through dialectical analysis, extraction of national tradition of scientific and democratic essence of factors to promote the formation of The. This shows that national traditions must be a rational resolution and escorts before they can demonstrate their value. Feng Qi was the epistemological problems raised by the history of philosophy summed up in four: one, I feel able to give objective reality? Second, the theoretical thinking can achieve scientific truth (that is, how scientific knowledge may be the problem)? Third, logical thinking, ability to grasp the concrete truth (the world's first unified theory, the development of law of the universe, that is, the Possibility of metaphysics as a scientific problem)? Fourth, people can be free (free personality or how to train ideal personality problems)? In his view, the West with the knowledge generated by empirical knowledge of, in fact, only the first two problems to solve, while the latter two issues as the scope of the problem and give up the metaphysical answer. Thus, they directly equivalent to knowledge of epistemology. Chinese philosophy as the first two questions on the discussion of fewer, they will not come to Chinese philosophy, epistemology an important role in the conclusion. In fact, in Feng Qi seems more to study Chinese philosophy, in fact the latter two issues, then the two issues in the height of the dialectical materialist theory of knowledge, epistemology belong to the same extent as on the dialectics of Hegel and Marxism , epistemology and logic, the principle of unity, to answer these two questions. Fung of this argument in Chinese philosophy the practice of traditional epistemology is in fact the use of the epistemology of dialectical materialism principle, the Chinese thought tradition Yuanben the nature of a certain metaphysical universe Unification Principle and the Ideal Personality of the Issue of , conversion to a kind of epistemological problems of traditional ancient Chinese thought to be valuable content in the butt on the dialectical materialism. Such a butt, on the one hand, in a sense, it seems that the traditional Chinese thought from the character of our point of view, to understand modern Chinese intellectual history of philosophy as a rational source mindset of faith; and on the other hand it seems also shows that the ancient belief in the metaphysical nature, only the butt in the modern sense of scientific basis to the value of a true faith. This is perhaps the Marxist belief in scientific rationality as the reason. Such a philosophy is the nature of rational belief, trained with the Dainian under the
general, philosophical ideas in such a culture dominated by the concept always points to the future. By tradition as part of awareness campaigns, the use of dialectics of cultural factors in the extract valuable to create new, more comprehensive and universal system of philosophy, seems to be the fate of national culture. As Dainian integrated innovation that aims to attempt to dialectical materialism as the trunk, integrated ancient Chinese philosophy of naturalism and a combination of traditional moral doctrine, and the analytic philosophy of Western spirit of logical analysis to create a new culture of the future system; Feng Qi also tried to combine Marxism into the merits of ancient Chinese philosophy, and 14 From this, we can see that the future generation of philosophers, also for the universal aspirations of the spirit world. In essence, they treat such a universal system of philosophy demands, as the mission of modern Chinese culture, the same is also the mission of this culture as the modern Chinese nation-building is an important dimension to look at. Lan Although not completely accepted Marxism, but still the spirit of this philosophy that generation Zhexue Jia's representatives, he said, When peoples live in harmony, then there will be a new, including the natural, social, and personal life in all aspects of the wide range of philosophical systems,UGG boots cheap, social structure, as was the theoretical foundation and spirit of the times of the content. all aspects of civilization, the broad philosophical system, as the country's pointer. resolved. However, both Mr Fung seems a little too optimistic, followed by the mid-eighties on, troubled past and present issues in modern China and the West again. 85 started the
nearly four years (1985-1988) of the [17] in a certain sense, we still live in this Had just settled a few years ago the History of Chinese Philosophy Sihu You have to rethink their target, scope and methods, to re-evaluate their role and purpose. For the
eighties First, the may be on the discussion of humanism and alienation after the multi understanding of Marxism began to appear. History of ideas in the context of these three, there is an important background, it is the were the main featuring.
How to treat and settle around the On the accumulation of cultural psychology, Between these four factions, in fact, there are also echoes the logical point of view the transfer relationship between the four factions of this transformation logic, in a sense also constitutes the focus of study focuses on the history of Chinese philosophy as well as the internal logic of the paradigm shift.
so-called After in-depth inquiry, we found hou This stand is actually a historical consciousness in the relationship between social being and social reconstruction of the results to be subtle. One hand, he insisted social being determines social consciousness, social consciousness and social existence with the reaction of the principle of historical materialism, on the other hand put the existence of social consciousness, the reaction of the community had some creative interpretation, he pointed out that social consciousness of the reaction is accumulated by the ideological and theoretical or into a culture - mental structures to achieve this culture - mental structure . It has gone through the class, all the variation of the times, but to maintain some form of structural stability. constituted a kind of ethnic culture and psychological characteristics, it has not directly subject to its not entirely, dependent on the economic and political changes the relative independence of the law and their own development. So, he exists in society and the dialectical relationship between social consciousness among the intermediary of an isolated culture - mental structure, the structure as the main content of cultural tradition, although a social consciousness and the final decision by the social existence, But it already has a stable nature of social existence, and has a foundation of social existence from the original energy. This view, in the complex on the relationship between social being and social consciousness to understand, but also makes the cultural traditions to maintain their independence in the integrity of the value system, to be settled within the principle of historical materialism, but not necessarily based on dialectics
In his view, since the history of philosophy is one. This shows that the object of the history of philosophy should in fact contain such a self-consciousness about the cultural traditions, not necessarily only theoretical thinking in cultural traditions or epistemological results. At the same time, to explore the history of philosophy and meditation should be tradition and what the future will be a specific relationship ... ... Visible, though not the history of philosophy, or cultural history of Chinese academic thought, but it is the Chinese culture as a whole value system of self and reflection. Hou to this value system, known as [21] For this cultural tradition, he should be doing that modern technology - the process of building the social structure, make the best use and care transformation. This is the so-called He put the cultural conflicts between Chinese and Western, placed in the general history of the modern movement process, rather than ancient and modern Chinese and Western cultural conflicts between each other of about simple. This is his However, the study of its foundation, it is still accessible based on the history of Marxist historical materialism. Although he saw the history between Marxism and the Ethics of antinomy, complicated relationship between the two, but he just comes down to culture, ethics and conflict in the history of the conflict, indeed underestimated the role of cultural traditions.
in the eighties of the However, Gan Yang on Written in 1985 autumn, . In Hou for the : open the possibility of infinite or that possible world, and as such, 'traditional' can never be only equal to 'in the past what already exists', on the contrary, the traditional means first of all 'possible future things'. So, he reached the explain the significance of a general nature on the field of vision, It is the social system and cultural system of Thus, Gan Yang that For the traditional view, we must ask is, a Perhaps this explains his science with a creative misuse. According to the hermeneutic fusion of horizons theory, the creation of traditional, in fact, the past and the future integration of sight now, and if the loss of the traditional past of, how to make the necessary fusion of horizons it? If the introduction of the traditional past, the traditional creation would not be achieved through the anti-tradition, but in the past and the future fusion of horizons of completion. Such a concept of the hermeneutic tradition, of course, on the whole, and its totality is to emphasize the traditional view of itself in continuing to back the integrity of the past for the future be open to new. This traditional creation, will it be possible to create and change to ensure that the final is the Chinese people themselves to create and change, is .
However, this traditional view of the overall due to the nature of the hermeneutic perspective into the Since then, Chinese Philosophy gradually understood as a living tradition, overall; but also to the History 开始 may have 思想性 and practical nature, in this based on more then the So, along with the At the same time, but also for China as it would have to understand the way the history of academic thinking aside the possibility.
later Gan Yang, If the tradition is the use of pre-school resources to explain the results, then the traditional view of late, the greater use of Kant, Weber, Habermas and the idea of resources as well as Daniel Bell. This idea is different from the hermeneutics of resources on the overall vision, and adopted a system of differentiation of social systems and cultural point of view. According to this view, he opposed the Confucian tradition can or comply with or to promote or open a modern way of thinking. In his view, the so-called damage to the Confucian value of independence. Obviously, his view of this new tradition is to Weber on tools of modern society itself implies a conflict between rationality and value rationality framework of social theory launched. In his view, the traditional Confucian position in the modern world is:
No comments:
Post a Comment